Name of Item: BBC Article (Children Spend Six hours or more
a day on screens)
Author: Jane Wakefield Year of Publication/Publisher: 27th
March 2015
Validity of Document: The article created by Jane Wakefield
is validated but the problems with it is that it was posted in 2015 which means
it is outdated.
History of Document / Author: Technology Reporter
Ideological Bias: The BBC are centred
Financial Bias: Publically Funded
Evaluation: The information from the article is not
appropriate to the rest of my research, but it does relate to parts of the
Ofcom report. The information is trustworthy because it is from a centred
background. The issues that must be followed up with is finding out where they
have sourced their information.
Name of Item: Ofcom Report (2016)
Author: Ofcom Year
of Publication/Publisher: 2017
Validity of Document: This document is valid because it is
the most up to date version of it and they use facts and statistics to back up
any points they have made.
History of Document / Author: They have collectively created
the same report over multiple years
Ideological Bias: Centre
Financial Bias: Government Funded
Evaluation: The information from this report is one of the
most appropriate to my research and since it is an updated version of original
stimulus. The information is trustworthy because it is up to date and from a
source which is a reliable.
Name of Item: The Guardian (Children spending more time
online than watching TV for the first time) & (Children spending less time
in front of the TV as they turn to online media)
Author: Jasper Jackson Year
of Publication/Publisher: 2016 & 2015
Validity of Document: The 2016 document is the most relevant
and was created from a valid source who has authority on the subject they are
talking about.
History of Document / Author: Assistant Media editor of The
Guardian
Ideological Bias: Centre Left
Financial Bias: Privately Owned
Evaluation: The information was appropriate because it
backed up my primary research, this also contradicts the Ofcom report. The
guardian is a trustworthy source of information because it is a centred left
company which means they are not conservative.
Name of Item: BARB
Author: BARB Year
of Publication/Publisher: 2017, 2016, 2015
Validity of Document: This is a valid source of information
because they are using facts and statistics to show the figures of television
viewing percentages.
History of Document / Author: BARB is Broadcasters’ Audience Research
Board, they collect and display the viewing figures for UK television
audiences.
Ideological Bias: -
Financial Bias: The company is financed from other large
companies within the Television industry, BARB is a not-for-profit company.
Evaluation: The information is appropriate because it
relates back to the original Ofcom report and shows the audiences viewing
percentage for certain genres of TV channels which Ofcom is missing.
Name of Item: Survey
Author: Myself Year
of Publication/Publisher:2017
Validity of Document:-
History of Document / Author -
Ideological Bias: -
Financial Bias: -
Evaluation: Information from my primary research was
appropriate to my secondary research and the original report, the results from
my survey did not correlate with the survey Ofcom created but, links with The
Guardian and BARB.
Name of Item: Focus Group
Author: Myself Year
of Publication/Publisher: 2017
Validity of Document: -
History of Document / Author: -
Ideological Bias: -
Financial Bias: -
Evaluation: The information was partly appropriate because
some questions have already been asked in survey which was done previously. I
can trust the information because I have individually collected the research
and no bias was involved in it.
No comments:
Post a Comment